RANDOMIZATION IS AN INFREQUENTLY USED METHOD IN INTERVENTIONAL PHASE II CLINICAL TRIALS OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH LYMPHOMA

نویسندگان

چکیده

Introduction: Clinical trials are important to inform decision making and improve outcomes for patients with lymphoma. Phase II designed determine if a new treatment has enough promising efficacy safety warrant further investigation in phase III trial. Randomized controlled have historically received the greatest consideration providing reliable evidence of drug's efficacy. However, Single Arm Non-Randomized Studies (SANRS) been considered as valid option by regulators. It reported that 66% (49/74) approvals granted between 1999 2014 from European Medicines Agency (EMA) U.S. Food Drug Administration (FDA) were based on nonrandomized experiments oncology including hematological malignancies, lymphoma is one most common cancer types single arm FDA drug approval. The aim this report evaluate proportion evolution time use randomization interventional clinical adult lymphoma, using sample ClinicalTrials.govdatabase. Methods: We conducted predefined search United States National Library Medicine database (ClinicalTrials.gov) field “condition or disease” term "lymphoma" filters "interventional studies", "phase 2 studies” “adults = >18–64 years old” plus “older adults 65 older”. examined all met inclusion criteria January 1st, 2012, through December 31st, 2022. excluded overlapping terminology did not enroll mature lymphoid neoplasms, such precursor b-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukaemia, anaplastic kinase (ALK) non-small-cell lung involving very broad disease categories “advanced cancer”, “hematological malignancies” “high risk populations” exception when significant was expected be enrolled. Difficult cases discussed decided at discretion authors. Results: Our returned 2085 trials, those we included 1376 analysis according our inclusion/exclusion criteria. found 2012 2022 performed 12.8% (177/1376) histogram (Figure 1) shows number increased during period, but randomized remained proportionally low. Keywords: therapeutics other No conflicts interests pertinent abstract.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

More randomization in phase II trials: necessary but not sufficient.

Historically, phase II trials in oncology were generally single armed, constructed to distinguish between a tumor response rate felt to indicate a lack of promise (often 5%) and a rate that would indicate potential benefit (often 20%), with a one-sided type I error rate of 5%–10% and a type II error rate of 10%–20% (1). The dominant use of this design was based on the premise that an agent that...

متن کامل

Quality of Randomization in Clinical Trials Published in Persian Journals of Medical Sciences Indexed in Scopus during 2013-2017

Background and Objectives: Randomization is one of the principles of correct clinical trial. The aim of this study was to determine the quality of randomization in the published articles of clinical trials in the Persian-language journals indexed in Scopus.  ed in Scopus D Methods: In this cross-sectional study, all clinical trials published in Persian journals indexed in Scopus during 2013-2...

متن کامل

CLINICAL TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONS Phase 2 trial of romidepsin in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma

1Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD; 2Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, MD; 3Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia; 4City of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; 5Hoftra North Shore–Long Island Je...

متن کامل

Modeling Heterogeneity in Phase II Clinical Trials

Problem statement: The common assumption in non-randomized Phase II clinical trials is a homogeneous population with homogeneous response. This assumption is at odds with many trials today; a heterogeneous response due to the existence of subgroups. Approach: In order to examine the effects of heterogeneity on the trial outcome, a systematic platform is developed to quantify the range and class...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Hematological Oncology

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1099-1069', '0278-0232']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.3165_513