Pursuit of physiologic pacing

Physiologic pacing: where pacing mode selection reflects the indication.

Results of recent trials suggest that in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, interventricular synchrony is possibly more important than atrioventricular synchrony. In patients with AV block and conduction system disease, alternatives to right ventricular apical pacing are therefore needed.

A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing.

Clinical trials in patients with pacemakers for sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block (AVB) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators provide increasing evidence showing that desynchronization of ventricular electrical activation and contraction, induced by conventional right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing, is a serious threat for long-term cardiac morbidity and mortality. The risk ...

Who Needs Physiologic Pacing and Why?

Various pacing technologies have been developed during the past 50 years since the first pacemaker was implanted in 1958. Dual-chamber pacing, rate responsiveness, programmable and rate-responsive atrioventricular (AV) intervals, alternative-site pa0cing, and new multichamber pacing devices are all attempts to mimic normal cardiac physiology as much as feasible. The categories of alternative-si...

Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after pacing: the Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing. CTOPP Investigators.

OBJECTIVES This study examined the effect of physiologic pacing on the development of chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) in the Canadian Trial Of Physiologic Pacing (CTOPP). BACKGROUND The role of physiologic pacing to prevent CAF remains unclear. Small randomized studies have suggested a benefit for patients with sick sinus syndrome. No data from a large randomized trial are available. METH...

Physiologic dual chamber pacing in radiation-induced atrioventricular block.