منابع مشابه
Reasoning with imprecise belief structures
This paper extends the theory of belief functions by introducing new concepts and techniques, allowing to model the situation in which the beliefs held by a rational agent may only be expressed (or are only known) with some imprecision. Central to our approach is the concept of intervalvalued belief structure, defined as a set of belief structures verifying certain constraints. Starting from th...
متن کاملImprecise belief updating for uncertain user modelling
In this paper we present a new approach to incremental user recognition in fuzzy environments where user classification is updated within an epistemological model. We extend Einhorn and Hogarth’s anchor and adjustment method ([7]), itself derived from a study of human behaviour, from the point value representation of belief and evidence to the case where belief and evidence are imprecise. We re...
متن کاملAnti-luck Epistemology, Pragmatic Encroachment, and True Belief
Two common theses in contemporary epistemology are that 'knowl-edge excludes luck' and that knowledge depends on 'purely epistemic' factors. In this essay, I shall argue as follows: given some plausible assumptions, 'anti-luck epistemology,' which is committed to the fi rst thesis, implies the falsity of the second thesis. That is, I will argue that anti-luck epistemology leads to what has been...
متن کاملGaussian Belief Space Planning for Imprecise Articulated Robots
For many emerging applications, actuators are being developed to avoid injuring humans and actuation and sensing precision is reduced to keep costs down. For planning and control of such robots, belief space and POMDP-based methods show great promise but have primarily been applied to cases where robots can be approximated as points or spheres. We extend this framework to non-spherical articula...
متن کاملMeaning and Pragmatism James on the Pragmatic Consequences of Belief
In the third lecture of his 1907 Pragmatism, William James famously presented his pragmatic theory of meaning by posing the simple question “what difference would it practically make to anyone if this notion rather than that notion were true?” James’s pragmatic method of clarifying the meaning of conceptions was simply to trace what he called their respective “practical consequences.” However, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophy of Science
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0031-8248,1539-767X
DOI: 10.1086/673925