Over-REACHing Conclusions

Reaching Agreement over Ontology Alignments

When agents communicate, they do not necessarily use the same vocabulary or ontology. For them to interact successfully, they must find correspondences (mappings) between the terms used in their respective ontologies. While many proposals for matching two agent ontologies have been presented in the literature, the resulting alignment may not be satisfactory to both agents, and thus may necessit...

Conclusions Regarding Cross-Group Differences in Happiness Depend on Difficulty of Reaching Respondents.

A growing literature explores differences in subjective well-being across demographic groups, often relying on surveys with high nonresponse rates. By using the reported number of call attempts made to participants in the University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers, we show that comparisons among easy-to-reach respondents differ from comparisons among hard-to-reach ones. Notably, easy-to-reac...

Reaching Consensus with Imprecise Probabilities Over a Network

This paper discusses the problem of a distributed network of agents attempting to agree on an imprecise probability over a network. Unique from other related work however, the agents must reach agreement while accounting for relative uncertainties in their respective probabilities. First, we assume that the agents only seek to agree to a centralized estimate of the probabilities, without accoun...

Group Reaching over Digital Tabletops with Digital Arm Embodiments

Straight Edge Punk – Religious Mutation or Over - reaching ?

A mutation is often thought of in negative terms, that is, as a damaged or altered gene that can no longer fulfil its purpose as intended. However if we reverse our view and consider the whole as the vehicle that is incapable of fulfilling its purpose then the mutation becomes a new possibility. For the purposes of this paper, religion in its traditional sense will be considered as the „faulty ...