Observer reproducibility in grading dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: comparison between two different grading systems.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Observer reproducibility in grading dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: comparison between two different grading systems.
The two most well known and well defined grading systems for dysplasia in colorectal adenomas were compared with regard to reproducibility. The Konishi-Morson system (KMS) operates with several histological and cytological variables and grades of mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia. The Kozuka system is based on the extent of nuclear pseudostratification and also has three grades of dysplasia ...
متن کاملReproducibility of grading systems in oral epithelial dysplasia
OBJECTIVE To assess inter and intra observer variability in grading oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) using Smith and Pindborg grading system, WHO classification system and Brothwell DJ et al. classification system. STUDY DESIGN In the study 45 histological tissues of dysplasia, 15 each of mild, moderate and severe dysplasia were coded and blindly graded by three observers in three grading syst...
متن کاملContract Grading – Traditional Grading: A Comparison By:
The study compared the relationship of the contract plan of student evaluation and a traditional type of evaluation, for changes in knowledge and attitudes during a college course in ecological relationships. The Syracuse Environmental Awareness Test was used to measure both cognitive and affective changes. In the experimental group the contract, plan of evaluation was utilized. Subjects were e...
متن کاملPedicle screw placement accuracy impact and comparison between grading systems
BACKGROUND Pedicle screw instrumentation is widely used for spinal stabilization. However, the accuracy for free-hand screw placement ranges from 69% to 94%. This study assesses the value of the existing classification systems, and investigates their impact on the ability to assess the accuracy of free-hand screw placement. METHODS Data were collected retrospectively from the medical records ...
متن کاملProspective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.
BACKGROUND Existing scales for assessing faecal incontinence have not been validated against clinical assessment, or with regard to reproducibility. They also fail to take into account faecal urgency, and the use of antidiarrhoeal medications. AIMS To establish the validity, and sensitivity to change, of existing scales and a newly designed incontinence scale. METHODS (1) Twenty three patie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Clinical Pathology
سال: 1990
ISSN: 0021-9746
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.43.4.320