Multiple Comparisons among Means

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparisons of Lognormal Population Means

Comparisons of two lognormal population means are investigated. For large samples, the conventional test for significance of the population means is the ordinary Student /-test with normal critical value. By Chen and Loh's result (Ann. Statist. 20 (1992)), however, the transformed i-test based on legdata is asymptotically more powerful than the ordinary i-test. In this paper, a new power transf...

متن کامل

Multiple comparisons

While multiple testing procedures have been the focus of much statistical research, an important facet of the problem is how to deal with possible confounding. Procedures have been developed by authors in genetics and statistics. In this chapter, we relate these proposals. We propose two new multiple testing approaches within this framework. The first combines sensitivity analysis methods with ...

متن کامل

Performance Comparisons of the K-Means Algortihm

The k-means algorithm is a widely used clustering technique. Here we will examine the performance of multiple implementations of the k-means algorithm in different settings. Our discussion will touch on the implementation of the algorithm in both python and C, and will also mention a 3rd party package for the k-means algorithm that is also written in C but provides python bindings. We will then...

متن کامل

A Note on the Comparisons among Coherent Systems

 Using the concept of system signature introduced by Samaniego (1985), Kochar et al. (1999) compared the lifetimes of the systems in which the lifetimes of the components are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables. Their results are extended to the systems with exchangeable components by Navarro et al. (2005). This paper gives some alternative proofs to obtain th...

متن کامل

Multiple comparisons, explained.

The commentary by Savitz and Olshan (1) and the response by Thompson (2) form a fascinating contrast. Savitz and Olshan speak in the language of epidemiology, complaining about the seeming arbitrary and antiscientific dictates of conventional (frequentist) statistical methodology, particularly as it applies to the study of many associations. Thompson, speaking mainly in the language of statisti...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the American Statistical Association

سال: 1961

ISSN: 0162-1459,1537-274X

DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090