Misconduct oversight at the DOE: Investigation closed
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Metagenome Analysis of Contaminated Sediments at the DOE Hanford Site
s received after January 24, 2005 Metagenome Analysis of Contaminated Sediments at the DOE Hanford Site Natalia Maltsev1, Tanuja Bompada1, Banu Gopalan2 ([email protected]), Shu-mei Li3, Weiwen Zhang3, J. Chris Detter4, Paul Richardson4, Margie Romine3, and Fred Brockman3 1Bioinformatics Group, Argonne National Laboratory; 2Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Pacific Northwest National Labora...
متن کاملFindings of Misconduct in Science/Research Misconduct
All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked in any building at the Wah Chang facility in Albany, Oregon, for the operational period from January 1, 1971 through December 31, 1972, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of empl...
متن کاملFindings of Misconduct in Science/Research Misconduct
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When submitting comments or requesting information, please include the OMB control number 4040–0001 and document identifier HHS–EGOV– 18380–30D for reference. Information Collection Request Title: SF–424 Research & Related (R&R). OMB No.: 4040–0001. Abstract: The SF–424 Research & Related Information Collection is an information collection comprised of a set of standa...
متن کاملThe "doe Effect"
of terms. Higher education has come to be another kind of school of hard knocks, where alcohol consumption, drug use, "unsafe" sex (much less any sex), violence, gambling, and other vices are officially disapproved of with a wink that abhors more than anything else, public notice of rules broken, bent, and ignored. Wolfe's novel is not so much loaded with caricatures, as it is indiscreet in the...
متن کاملScientific Misconduct.
Scientific misconduct has been defined as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Scientific misconduct has occurred throughout the history of science. The US government began to take systematic interest in such misconduct in the 1980s. Since then, a number of studies have examined how frequently individual scientists have observed scientific misconduct or were involved in it. Although the ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/475020a