MinMax fairness: from Rawlsian Theory of Justice to solution for algorithmic bias
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract This paper presents an intuitive explanation about why and how Rawlsian Theory of Justice (Rawls in A theory justice, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1971) provides the foundations to a solution for algorithmic bias. The contribution is discuss show ideas their original form (e.g. veil ignorance , position allowing inequalities that serve worst-off) are relevant operationalize fairness decision making. also explains this leads specific MinMax solution, which addresses basic challenges justice. We combine substantive elements perspective with order provide accessible practical insights. goal propose motivate derived from principles overcomes some current bias highlight benefits provided when compared other approaches. discusses by building bridge between qualitative theoretical aspects quantitative technical approach.
منابع مشابه
Rawlsian Justice and Palliative Care.
Palliative care serves both as an integrated part of treatment and as a last effort to care for those we cannot cure. The extent to which palliative care should be provided and our reasons for doing so have been curiously overlooked in the debate about distributive justice in health and healthcare. We argue that one prominent approach, the Rawlsian approach developed by Norman Daniels, is unabl...
متن کاملRawlsian Individuals: Justice, Experiments, and Complexity
John Rawls’s A Theory of Justice is examined from the perspective of experimental methods in economics and complex adaptive systems simulations. This paper first discusses the justice principle selection process in Rawls’s representation of it as a hypothetical experiment. This hypothetical experiment fails to satisfy reasonable experimental controls, particularly as reflects the conception of ...
متن کاملA Rawlsian Perspective on Justice for the Disabled
I aim to identify and describe some basic elements of a Rawlsian approach that may help us to think conscientiously about how, from the standpoint of justice, we should treat the disabled. Rawls has been criticized for largely ignoring issues of this sort. These criticisms lose their appeal, I suggest, when we distinguish between a Rawlsian standpoint and the limited project Rawls mainly undert...
متن کاملMeasuring Justice and Fairness
This chapter reviews the measurement approaches used in the justice literature. We begin by describing fundamental issues involved in constructing measures, such as item content, focus, context, and experience bracketing. We then introduce a 2 x 2 taxonomy wherein measurement approaches are distinguished by (a) whether they emphasize more descriptive perceptions of justice rule adherence or mor...
متن کاملFairness in Operations: From Theory to Practice
This thesis deals with two basic issues in resource allocation problems. The first issue pertains to how one approaches the problem of designing the "right" objective for a given resource allocation problem. The notion of what is "right" can be fairly nebulous; we consider two issues that we see as key: efficiency and fairness. We approach the problem of designing objectives that account for th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: AI & society
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0951-5666', '1435-5655']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01577-x