Matt Morgan: Why Dylan Thomas was wrong—and right
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Response to Dylan Thomas Lott
Reply by Moyer: The foregoing thought-provoking response to my inaugural IJTMB Research Section editorial takes issue with the way I have conceptualized “reductionism,” and with my position on its role and value in massage therapy (MT) research. I thank the author, Dylan Lott, for opening this dialogue, and for giving me the opportunity to clarify my position. Reductionism, notes The Oxford Com...
متن کاملThomas Hunt Morgan (1866-1945)
The son of Ellen Key and Charles Hunt Morgan, T. H. Morgan was born on 25 September 1866 into a prominent family in Lexington, Kentucky. Morgan grew up exploring the environment around his childhood home and developed a special interest in fossils. As a young man, he spent a summer employed doing geological and biological fieldwork in the Kentucky mountains. He received his BS degree from the U...
متن کاملThe 2006 Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal. Masatoshi Nei.
The Genetics Society of America annually honors members who have made outstanding contributions to genetics. The Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal recognizes a lifetime contribution to the science of genetics. The Genetics Society of America Medal recognizes particularly outstanding contributions to the science of genetics within the past 15 years. The George W. Beadle Medal recognizes distinguished ser...
متن کامل?Sex Limited Inheritance in Drosophila? (1910), by Thomas Hunt Morgan
In 1910, Thomas Hunt Morgan [4] performed an experiment at Columbia University [5], in New York City, New York, that helped identify the role chromosomes play in heredity. That year, Morgan was breeding Drosophila [6], or fruit flies. After observing thousands of fruit fly offspring with red eyes, he obtained one that had white eyes. Morgan began breeding the white-eyed mutant fly and found tha...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1756-1833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3722