منابع مشابه
Mating with the wrong species can be right.
The evolutionary importance of interspecific hybridisation has been a controversial issue for quite some time. Some view mating between different species as a maladaptive process; others stress the adaptive value of choosing heterospecific mates under ecological conditions that favour hybrids. A recent paper by Pfennig is the first study to make a priori predictions of how adaptive choice betwe...
متن کاملCritical Study of Right to be wrong From the point of view ofcollectivists, utilitarians, and virtuosos
circuit right discourse is one of the most common theories in the contemporary period about regulating human social relations. The formation of this course of thought and the exhibition of a unidimensional understanding of the concept of right in the West is the result of socio-political changes in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It was during this period that thinkers’ response to th...
متن کاملRight and wrong reasons to be screened.
How would you feel if you found out that your 85-yearold mother (or grandmother, if you prefer) had just undergone a pelvic examination to obtain a routine Pap smear? Perhaps you’d be pleased, believing she was being provided the best possible preventive care for cervical cancer. Maybe you’d be reassured, seeing it as evidence that her doctor still cares about her. Perhaps you’d be angry, viewi...
متن کاملWhat Is Wrong with Cae and Can It Be Xed?
1 Early CAE promises \Contemplation of the similarity between the brain and computers promises to shed light on some of the mysterious workings of the mind and also suggest fruitful directions for computer design and programming," announced Dalkey (1958, p. 3) at the ASCE First Conference on Electronic Computation, in 1958. While acknowledging that the above similarity is only an analogy, he di...
متن کاملIs It Right to Be Wrong About the Future?
Personal predictions are often optimistically biased. This simple observation has troubling implications for psychologists, economists, and decision theorists concerned with rationality and the accuracy of self-knowledge (Armor & Taylor, 2002; Krizan & Windschitl, 2007; Sweeny, Carroll, & Shepperd, 2006). However, normative conclusions about the impropriety of optimistic bias rest on an unteste...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Trends in Ecology & Evolution
سال: 2008
ISSN: 0169-5347
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.001