Losing grip on the third realm: against naive realism for intuitions

Abstract Naive realism in philosophy of perception is the view that (factive) involves a direct relation between perceiving subjects and world. The naive realist says your cat on mat worldly partially constituted by mat; spatio-temporal chunk world presenting itself to you. Recently, Elijah Chudnoff John Bengson have independently developed an extension this intellectual experiences, or intuitions, for traditionally priori domains. We argue view, which we call ‘intuitional realism’ (INR), will not epistemic advantages claim it does. In perception, but intuition, there deeper explanation what makes case one experience while another not. Whether INR true, then, does no interesting epistemological work