Kalai-Smorodinsky Bargaining Solution and Alternating Offers Game

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Randomized dictatorship and the Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution

Randomized dictatorship,” one of the simplest ways to solve bargaining situations, works as follows: a fair coin toss determines the “dictator”—the player to be given his first-best payoff. The two major bargaining solutions, that of Nash (1950) and that of Kalai and Smorodinsky (1975), Pareto-dominate this process. However, whereas the existing literature offers axiomatizations of the Nash sol...

متن کامل

Fairness in Bargaining and the Kalai-Smorodinsky Solution

A bargaining solution guarantees minimal equity if each player’s payoff is at least as large as the minimum of the payoffs assigned to him by the equal-gain (i.e., egalitarian) and equal-loss solutions. The KalaiSmorodinsky solution is the unique scale-invariant 2-person solution with this property. There does not exist a scale-invariant n-person solution with this property.

متن کامل

Focal points in bargaining and the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution

The Kalai-Smorodinsky solution is characterized by three axioms: balanced focal point, disagreement point monotonicity, and restricted IIA.

متن کامل

Efficiency-free characterizations of the Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution

Roth (1977) axiomatized the Nash (1950) bargaining solution without Pareto optimality, replacing it by strong individual rationality in Nash’s axiom list. In a subsequent work (Roth, 1979) he showed that when strong individual rationality is replaced by weak individual rationality, the only solutions that become admissible are the Nash and the disagreement solutions. In this paper I derive anal...

متن کامل

The Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution with loss aversion

We consider bargaining problems under the assumption that players are loss averse, i.e., experience disutility from obtaining an outcome lower than some reference point. We follow the approach of Shalev (2002) by imposing the self-supporting condition on an outcome: an outcome z in a bargaining problem is self-supporting under a given bargaining solution, whenever transforming the problem using...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Theoretical Economics Letters

سال: 2013

ISSN: 2162-2078,2162-2086

DOI: 10.4236/tel.2013.31012