International Humanitarian Law Perspective on Un-Targeting Attack

نویسندگان

چکیده

The Syrian conflict started on January 26th, 2011. At first, the in Syria was an internal between government of Bashar Al Assad and Rebel, descent into war began with violent brutal repression peaceful pro-reform protests, which later turned armed uprising against regime al-Assad, has since become a regional involving state non-state actors. In development conflict, some parties intervened to provide support for al-Assad. One countries that intervene is Russia. happened September 2015 early October 2016, more than 9,000 people, including 4,000 civilians, were killed by Russian airstrikes. International Humanitarian Law hostilities regulate protection victims restrictions means methods warfare. This study aims identify obstacles legal enforcement international humanitarian law toward un-targeting attack Syria. addition, this tries reveal responsibility these states, both Russia loss injury caused attack. result shows case not party several conventions. Therefore, conventions are applicable formally Based Law, Government responsible occurred Syria, required make full reparation or such violations. They Furthermore, Individuals belonging Organizations State held personally before law. Then, United Nations Security Council (UNSC) must carry out UN Charter Articles 41 42 UNSC as main organ maintaining peace security.

منابع مشابه

Challenges to international humanitarian law: Israel’s occupation policy

The complexity of the ever-shifting humanitarian landscape in the Middle East region –where the effects of perennial conflict and instability have rarely been contained within one country – is a major preoccupation for humanitarian organisations like the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). As fighting continues in Syria, unprecedented levels of displacement and destruction have res...

متن کامل

Weaponising neurotechnology: international humanitarian law and the loss of language

In recent years, research on military applications of neuroscience has grown in sophistication, raising the question as to whether states using weapon systems that draw on neuroscience are capable of applying international humanitarian law (IHL) to that use. I argue that neuroweapons largely eliminate the role of language in targeting, render unstable the distinction between superior and subord...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Varia Justicia

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1907-3216', '2579-5198']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v17i2.5674