منابع مشابه
Nash equilibrium and generalized integration for infinite normal form games
Infinite normal form games that are mathematically simple have been treated [ Harris, C.J., Stinchcombe, M.B., Zame, W.R., in press. Nearly compact and continuous normal form games: characterizations and equilibrium existence. Games Econ. Behav.]. Under study in this paper are the other infinite normal form games, a class that includes the normal forms of most extensive form games with infinite...
متن کاملNash equilibrium
In game theory, Nash equilibrium (named after John Forbes Nash, who proposed it) is a solution concept of a game involving two or more players, in which each player is assumed to know the equilibrium strategies of the other players, and no player has anything to gain by changing only his own strategy unilaterally. If each player has chosen a strategy and no player can benefit by changing his or...
متن کاملRefinements of Nash Equilibrium
In game theory, “refinement” refers to the selection of a subset of equilibria, typically on the grounds that the selected equilibria are more plausible than other equilibria. These notes are a brief, largely informal, survey of some of the most heavily used refinements. Throughout, “equilibria” means Nash equilibria (NE), unless I state otherwise explicitly. And throughout, I assume that the g...
متن کاملCorrelated Nash equilibrium
We modify the epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium only to accommodate Gilboa and Schmeidler’s [Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18 (1989), 141–153] maxmin expected utility preferences, and identify the equilibrium concept in n-player strategic games that characterizes the modified epistemic conditions. The epistemic characterization supports the equilibrium concept as a minimal generali...
متن کاملNegotiation-proof Nash equilibrium
This paper defines “negotiation-proof Nash equilibrium”, a notion that applies to environments where players can negotiate openly and directly prior to the play of a noncooperative game. It recognizes the possibility that a group of self-interested players may choose to coordinate, nonbindingly and voluntarily, their choice of strategies and make a joint objection, and it takes the perfect fore...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Logical Methods in Computer Science
سال: 2013
ISSN: 1860-5974
DOI: 10.2168/lmcs-9(2:3)2013