Ignore risk; Maximize expected moral value

Many philosophers assume that, when making moral decisions under uncertainty, we should choose the option that has greatest expected value, regardless of how risky it is. But their arguments for maximizing value do not support over rival, risk-averse approaches. In this paper, I present a novel argument value: think about larger series each decision is part of, all but most agents would prefer consistently with highest value. To extent what on given occasion be guided by entire choices prefer, then occasion,