Identifying systematic reviews: key resources
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Identifying systematic reviews: key resources.
How effective are antibiotics for treating patients with sore throat? The first choice of resource for the practitioner to answer a clinical effectiveness question such as this one should be a systematic review. By systematically searching, assessing, and summarizing the research evidence by using rigorous methods, the best systematic reviews present a time-saving distillation of the current st...
متن کاملIdentifying studies for systematic reviews. An example from medical imaging.
OBJECTIVES To determine if published figures on the proportion of articles included in systematic reviews and identified in electronic databases are applicable to an example from medical imaging. METHODS A systematic review was performed. Additionally, sensitivity and precision of a MEDLINE search were compared with values from three published searches, each customized for a specific field. ...
متن کاملWorldwide inequality in production of systematic reviews
Background: Investment in science is vital for the development and well-being of societies. This study aims to assess the scientific productivity of countries by quantifying their publication of systematic reviews taking the gross national income per capita (GNIPC) into account. Methods: Medline and ISI Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews published between 1st January 2006 an...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Living Systematic Reviews
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره 20، اردیبهشت 1400، 146-145 درآمدی بر مرورهای نظام‌مند زنده An Introduction to Living Systematic Reviews محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian تا کنون در سخنان سردبیری مجله دانشگاه، درباره انواع مقالات مروری، مطالب گوناگونی را به رشته تحریر در آورده‌ایم. هدف از نگارش این مقالات، آشنا ساختن خوانندگان و نویسندگان فرهیخته م...
متن کاملA comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension
BACKGROUND Bibliographic databases are the primary resource for identifying systematic reviews of health care interventions. Reliable retrieval of systematic reviews depends on the scope of indexing used by database providers. Therefore, searching one database may be insufficient, but it is unclear how many need to be searched. We sought to evaluate the performance of seven major bibliographic ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Evidence-Based Medicine
سال: 2000
ISSN: 1356-5524
DOI: 10.1136/ebm.5.3.68