HPB P69 Minimally invasive versus open management of chronic pancreatitis - A systematic review
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Background Surgical treatment for chronic pancreatitis (CP) is usually performed via an open approach through drainage (pancreaticojejunostomy) or resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy, Beger) procedures a combination of both (Frey's procedure). Minimally invasive (laparoscopic, robotic) management patients with CP represents technical challenge. The aim this systematic review to report the outcomes these minimally among themselves and compare them reported data from literature procedures. Methods A search using Embase Medline was identify articles reporting CP. Results Twelve studies 186 undergoing laparoscopic procedure their intractable abdominal pain caused by Sixty-six-point six percent (n=124) underwent while 33.3% (n=62) had partial total pancreas. Total relief achieved in 66.7–100% following pancreatojejunostomy, 93% Frey's procedure, 90% pancreatectomy islet transplantation 70% distal pancreatectomy. Conclusions Laparoscopic are safe feasible carefully selected group patients. However, more robust comparisons required between approaches form multi-centre randomised controlled trials.
منابع مشابه
Minimally Invasive versus Open Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review
Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy is an effective treatment for cervical radiculopathy due to disc herniations or spondylosis. Over the last decade, minimally invasive (i.e., percutaneous) procedures have become increasingly popular due to a smaller incision size and presumed benefits in postoperative outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the literature and identified studies of ope...
متن کاملMinimally invasive versus open thymectomy: a systematic review of surgical techniques, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes.
BACKGROUND Thymectomy is the mainstay of treatment for thymoma and other anterior mediastinal tumors, and is often utilized in the management of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). While traditionally approached through a median sternotomy, minimally invasive approaches to thymectomy have increasingly emerged. The present systematic review was conducted to compare perioperative and clinical o...
متن کاملMinimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Evidence on the benefits of minimally invasive surgery over open procedures in gastrointestinal surgery is continuing to accumulate. This is also the case for esophageal surgery. Esophageal cancer often requires extensive surgery and is, therefore, considered to be one of the most invasive elective gastrointestinal procedures. Clinical studies investigating means to reduce the invasive nature o...
متن کاملMinimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
OBJECTIVE : This meta-analysis sought to determine whether minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVS) improves clinical outcomes and resource utilization compared with conventional open mitral valve surgery (conv-MVS) in patients undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement. METHODS : A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CTSnet, and databases of abstracts was ...
متن کاملMinimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy/Discectomy, Transforaminal Lumbar, and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Systematic Review
Minimally invasive spine surgeries (MISS) are becoming increasingly favored as alternatives to open spine procedures because of the reduced blood loss, postoperative pain, and recovery time. Studies have shown mixed results regarding the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive procedures compared to the traditional, open counterparts. The objectives of this systematic analysis are to compare ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Surgery
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1365-2168', '0007-1323']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac404.163