GROUP UTILITY MODEL FOR ETHICAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION AMONG MULTIPLE DECISION MAKERS
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Conflict Resolution and Group Decision-Making
Conflict resolution in decision-making groups is studied using a System Dynamics model. The model is developed using a grounded-theory approach. Some preliminary results are shown. The results seem to be in line with much empirical research done in the management literature about conflict and conflict resolution at the group level of analysis. Ideas for further research are discussed. Introduct...
متن کاملInterval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Method based on Group Decision Analysis for Estimating Weights of Decision Makers
In this paper, a new soft computing group decision method based on the concept of compromise ratio is introduced for determining decision makers (DMs)' weights through the group decision process under uncertainty. In this method, preferences and judgments of the DMs or experts are expressed by linguistic terms for rating the industrial alternatives among selected criteria as well as the relativ...
متن کاملFuzzy Multiple Attributive Group Decision-Making for Conflict Resolution in Collaborative Design
Most conflicts in collaborative design are categorized as the problem of fuzzy multiple attributive group decision-making (FMAGDM). Both fuzzy assessments and the aggregation of multiple experts' opinions should be considered in the conflict resolution process. This paper presents a new approach for the problem, where cooperation degree (CD) and reliability degree (RD) are introduced for aggreg...
متن کاملInterval AHP for Group of Decision Makers
This paper considers Interval Analytic Hierarchy Process (Interval AHP) in group decision making for encouraging communication. Interval AHP is suitable method to handle subjective judgments since the induced results are intervals which can include uncertainty of given information. The decision makers’ opinions can be aggregated at some stages of decision making process to reach consensus. One ...
متن کاملAddressing time-scale differences among decision-makers through model abstractions
A decision support system (DSS) may, now more than ever, be shared by multiple decision-makers. Different decision-makers, however, can have different viewpoints and therefore different information needs in the use of a DSS. As a result, they may benefit from a system that is responsive to the special information needs of the individual user. This paper assumes, in particular, that decision-mak...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu
سال: 2002
ISSN: 0289-7806,1882-7187
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.2002.716_3