Fiduciary duty or loyalty? Evidence from co-opted boards and corporate misconduct
نویسندگان
چکیده
We examine the effect of co-opted boards on corporate misconduct and document a significant positive relationship. Utilising large sample public U.S. companies from period 2001 to 2015, we find that one standard deviation increase in proportion directors board leads 4.3% rise misconduct. This outcome is robust series sensitivity tests continues hold after accounting for potential endogeneity concerns. Further analyses indicate propose fewer agenda items, exhibit lower attendance at meetings, receive compensation packages excess industry norms, which exacerbate stakeholder-agency conflicts. Cross-sectional analysis demonstrates documented relationship most pronounced among firms with weak external monitoring, greater CEO-board social ties, whose members have high career concerns, where CEO power low. Additional reveal engage more environmental- workplace-related violations than other types stakeholder violations. Overall, our investigation generates original evidence presence aggravates incidence wrongdoing. Our study contributes continuing debate role has policy implications those responsible devising monitoring effective systems governance.
منابع مشابه
Law and Corporate Boards: Evidence from Europe
When minority shareholder laws are strong, then minority shareholders should have more power to affect board composition and structure. Therefore, countries with strong minority shareholder laws should have ‘good’ corporate boards of directors (i.e., one that looks out for minority shareholders’ bests interests). Assuming that boards with independent directors and fewer directors are indicative...
متن کاملParticipatory Liability for Breach of Trust or Fiduciary Duty
Confusion surrounds the equitable liability of a third party to a trust or fiduciary relationship who participates in a breach of the trust or fiduciary duty, but without necessarily receiving trust property.1 Compounding this confusion is the absence of consensus in courts that share a common Chancery law heritage. Notably, the English courts, including the Privy Council within that term, and ...
متن کاملMedical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
متن کامل
New Intra - System Fiduciary Duty Decision
Health lawyers representing nonprofit systems, or their component entities, should note a significant new ruling addressing intra-system fiduciary duties. On Thursday, May 26, a federal district court Judge issued a decision in the long-running litigation involving Lifespan Corporation and New England Medical Center (now known as Tufts Medical Center in Boston, MA). The decision is a complex, f...
متن کاملState-Owned Enterprises and Corporate Governance Strength: Evidence from Indonesia
Background: This study investigates whether state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia implement stronger corporate governance than do non-SOEs. It can be argued that as a large dedicated institutional investor, the Indonesian government has an incentive to strengthen corporate governance in SOEs and possesses the ability to bear the cost of implementing stronger governance. Research Methods: ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Corporate Finance
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0929-1199', '1872-6313']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102066