Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Should Eye Trust You?
Although following another person’s gaze is essential in fluent social interactions, the reflexive nature of this gaze-cuing effect means that gaze can be used to deceive. In a gaze-cuing procedure, participants were presented with several faces that looked to the left or right. Some faces always looked to the target (predictive-valid), some never looked to the target (predictive-invalid), and ...
متن کاملLearning When to Trust Which Experts
The standard model for prediction using a pool of experts has an underlying assumption that one of the experts performs well. In this paper, we show that this assumption does not take advantage of situations where both the outcome and the experts' predictions are based on some input which the learner gets to observe too. In particular, we exhibit a situation where each individual expert perform...
متن کاملnEmesis: Which Restaurants Should You Avoid Today?
Computational approaches to health monitoring and epidemiology continue to evolve rapidly. We present an end-to-end system, nEmesis, that automatically identifies restaurants posing public health risks. Leveraging a language model of Twitter users’ online communication, nEmesis finds individuals who are likely suffering from a foodborne illness. People’s visits to restaurants are modeled by mat...
متن کاملLearning W h e n to Trust Which Experts
1 I n t r o d u c t i o n 1.1 The Deficiency of the Standard Weighted Majority Techniques for Predict ion Using a Pool of Experts In [LW94], L i t t l es tone and W a r m u t h s tudy the p rob lem of m a k i n g on-l ine predic t ion using a pool of exper ts . In thei r model , the learner faces a (poss ib ly infinite) sequence of t r ia ls , wi th a boolean pred ic t ion to be m a d e in each...
متن کاملWho Should You Trust? Discriminating Genuine from Deceptive Eyewitness Accounts
In this study, we tested whether modified cognitive interviewing (MCI) is a valid method for distinguishing between genuine and deceptive human eyewitness accounts. 102 healthy military personnel were the participants of this study. 54 were assigned to a manual task condition and 48 to a cognitive task condition. Of the 54 assigned to the manual task, 17 truly performed the task and were truthf...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0031-8205,1933-1592
DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.x