Examining linguistic and experimenter biases through “non-native” versus “native” speech

Abstract There is a consensus in psycholinguistic research that listening to unfamiliar speech constitutes challenging situation. In this commentary, we explore the problems with construct of non-native and ask whether using useful, specifically shift communicative burden from language learner perceiver, who often occupies position power. We examine what factors affect perception talkers. frame question by addressing observation not all “difficult” conditions provide equal challenges. Given this, how cognitive social impact accents our measurements are capturing. close making recommendations for future work. propose issue less terminology native versus , but rather unexamined biases methodological assumptions make. can use existing dichotomy create programs focus on teaching perceivers better understand talkers more generally. Finally, call researchers alike idea being “native,” “non-native,” “unfamiliar,” “accented” align reality as opposed inherently biased views.