Evaluating convergent validity between RAISD and MSWO rankings across informants
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Reinforcer Assessment for Individuals with Severe Disabilities (RAISD) and multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment (MSWO) are evidence-based tools used to determine preferences indirectly through interview observation of choice making, respectively. Often, the RAISD is inform stimulus array MSWO. However, reports frequently vary between informants. This can lead discrepant identification putative reinforcers therefore has potential weaker or ineffective reinforcement-based treatments. purpose this study was compare MSWO outcomes across informants (adolescent, caregiver, teacher) evaluate convergent validity two measures. results indicated that participants, rarely produced validity. Implications practitioners researchers discussed.
منابع مشابه
Example: Convergent/discriminant Validity
Sociologist James A. Quinn states that the tasks of scientific method are related directly or indirectly to the study of similarities of various kinds of objects or events. One of the tasks of scientific method is that of classifying objects or events into categories and of describing the similar characteristics of members of each type. A second task is that of comparing variations in two or mo...
متن کاملConvergent Validity of the PUTS
Premonitory urges are a cardinal feature in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Severity of premonitory urges can be assessed with the "Premonitory Urge for Tic Disorders Scale" (PUTS). However, convergent validity of the measure has been difficult to assess due to the lack of other urge measures. We investigated the relationship between average real-time urge intensity assessed by an in-house deve...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Behavioral Interventions
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1072-0847', '1099-078X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1964