Epistemic trust: modeling children’s reasoning about others’ knowledge and intent
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Epistemic trust: modeling children's reasoning about others' knowledge and intent.
A core assumption of many theories of development is that children can learn indirectly from other people. However, indirect experience (or testimony) is not constrained to provide veridical information. As a result, if children are to capitalize on this source of knowledge, they must be able to infer who is trustworthy and who is not. How might a learner make such inferences while at the same ...
متن کاملModeling Epistemic Knowledge about Users
Representing what an intelligent agent knows or believes can be an important feature for an entity that acts in a collaborative environment. Epistemic logic programs are a clear way to reason about what an intelligent agent knows or believes, but the complexity of the reasoning is exponential. The paper presents a new kind of logic programs, the logic programs with two types of negation as fail...
متن کاملReasoning About Knowledge and Action in an Epistemic Event Calculus
We present a generalization of classical-logic Event Calculus that facilitates reasoning about non-binary-valued fluents in domains with non-deterministic, triggered, concurrent, and possibly conflicting actions. We show how this framework may be used as a basis for a “possible-worlds” style approach to epistemic and causal reasoning in a narrative setting. In this framework an agent may gain k...
متن کاملReasoning about Knowledge and Strategies: Epistemic Strategy Logic
In this paper we introduce Epistemic Strategy Logic (ESL), an extension of Strategy Logic with modal operators for individual knowledge. This enhanced framework allows us to represent explicitly and to reason about the knowledge agents have of their own and other agents’ strategies. We provide a semantics to ESL in terms of epistemic concurrent game models, and consider the corresponding model ...
متن کاملReasoning about self and others
In collaborative, competitive, and negotiation situations we need to reason about each other’s goals, intentions, beliefs, and desires, which requires a so-called Theory of Mind (ToM). This study investigates decision making in which ToM has to be applied recursively: “I think that you think that I think...”. Participants were presented with sequential games in which the payoff for one player d...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Developmental Science
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1363-755X,1467-7687
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01135.x