Douglas Walton: Argument Evaluation and Evidence
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Walton on Argument Structure
In previous work I argued against (i) the likelihood of finding a theoretically sound foundation for the linked/convergent distinction and (ii) the utility of the distinction even if a sound theoretical basis could be found. Here I subject Douglas Walton’s comprehensive discussion of the linked/convergent distinction found in Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory to careful scrutiny and argue ...
متن کاملWalton Implicatures as Forms of Argument
In this paper, we use concepts, structure and tools from argumentation theory to show how conversational implicatures are triggered by conflicts of presumptions. Presumptive implicatures are shown to be based on defeasible forms of inference used in conditions of lack of knowledge, including analogical reasoning, inference to the best explanation, practical reasoning, appeal to pity, and argume...
متن کاملWalton on Argument Structure University of Richmond
In previous work I argued against (i) the likelihood of finding a theoretically sound foundation for the linked/convergent distinction and (ii) the utility of the distinction even if a sound theoretical basis could be found. Here I subject Douglas Walton’s comprehensive discussion of the linked/convergent distinction found in Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory to careful scrutiny and argue ...
متن کاملBOOK REVIEW Douglas Walton (1998). The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of
Douglas Walton (1998). The New Dialectic. Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. x + 304 pages. ISBN 0-80207987-3. Douglas Walton (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. xx + 315 pages. ISBN 0-8173-0922-5. Douglas Walton (1999). One-Sided Arguments. A Dialectical Analysis Of Bias. State University of New York Press, Albany. ...
متن کاملDOUGLAS WALTON After Analytic Philosophy , What ' s Next ? : An Analytic Philosopher ' s Perspective
Philosophy, at the moment, seems to be in a transition period in which analytic philosophy, of the sort that has been predominant, is giving way to something new. But what will come next? Deconstructive and hermeneutic philosophies seem to indicate the right directions to fit the current relativistic climate of thought, but have failed to yield enough of a useful structure or method to carry ph...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Argumentation
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0920-427X,1572-8374
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-016-9413-7