Накази DNR (do not resuscitate – не реанімувати): концепція клінічної етики
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Case analysis: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)
When patients are hospitalized, in the United States, it is recommended that a discussion has to be held on DNR order with the patient. The information discussed should be documented. Before coming to a conclusion, it is important for the physician to provide the patient with full information and education on “no code” and “full code” and how they relate to the general medical condition. The or...
متن کاملCase analysis: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)
When patients are hospitalized, in the United States, it is recommended that a discussion has to be held on DNR order with the patient. The information discussed should be documented. Before coming to a conclusion, it is important for the physician to provide the patient with full information and education on “no code” and “full code” and how they relate to the general medical condition. The or...
متن کاملCase analysis: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)
When patients are hospitalized, in the United States, it is recommended that a discussion has to be held on DNR order with the patient. The information discussed should be documented. Before coming to a conclusion, it is important for the physician to provide the patient with full information and education on “no code” and “full code” and how they relate to the general medical condition. The or...
متن کاملEvaluation of do not resuscitate orders (DNR) in a Swiss community hospital.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of an intervention on the understanding and use of DNR orders by physicians; to assess the impact of understanding the importance of involving competent patients in DNR decisions. DESIGN Prospective clinical interventional study. SETTING Internal medicine department (70 beds) of the hospital of La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Nine junior physi...
متن کاملInvolving patients in do not resuscitate (DNR) decisions: an old issue raising its ugly head.
A recent paper in this journal (1) suggests that involving terminally ill patients in choices concerned with Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) produces 'psychological pain' and therefore is ill-advised. Such a claim rests on anecdotal observations made by the authors. In this paper I suggest that drawing conclusions in ethics, no less than in science, requires a rigorous framework and cannot...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Pain, anesthesia and intensive care
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2520-226X,2519-2078
DOI: 10.25284/2519-2078.3(76).2016.90100