Disagreement and Agonistic Chance in Peer Review

Peer Disagreement and Total Evidence

······································································································· 3

Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence

Disagreement for control of rational cheating in peer review: a simulation

Understanding the peer review process could help research and shed light on mechanisms that underlie crowdsourcing. We present an agent-based model of peer review built on three entities the paper, the scientist and the conference. The model allows us to define a rich model of scoring, evaluating and selecting papers for conferences. Some of the reviewers apply a strategy (called “rational chea...

A Simulation Of Disagreement For Control Of Rational Cheating In Peer Review

We present an agent-based model of peer review built on three entities the paper, the scientist and the conference. The systems is implemented on a BDI platform (Jason) that allows us to define a rich model of scoring, evaluating and selecting papers for conferences. Some of the reviewers apply a strategy (called “rational cheating”) aimed to prevent papers better than their own to be accepted....

ORI GIN AL PA PER Peer Disagreement and Independence Preservation

It has often been recommended that the differing probability distributions of a group of experts should be reconciled in such a way as to preserve each instance of independence common to all of their distributions. When probability pooling is subject to a universal domain condition, along with state-wise aggregation, there are severe limitations on implementing this recommendation. In particula...