Dialectical Situations and Argument Analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Discussion Note ALETHIC, EPISTEMIC, AND DIALECTICAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT
In a double-barreled attack on Charles Hamblin's influential book Fallacies (1970), Ralph Johnson (1990a) argues that Hamblin's chapter 1 is an unfair account of the standard treatment of fallacies, and then argues, in a second paper in Philosophy and Rhetoric (1990b), that Hamblin's chapter 7 on the concept of argument arrives at a wrong conclusion, based on reasoning that is flawed and proble...
متن کاملInformal Logic and the Dialectical Approach to Argument
Undoubtedly, Ralph H. Johnson and J. Anthony Blair are two of the patriarchs of informal logic (IL), and they remain its most recognized exponents. The informal logic movement initially began as a rejection of the tools of formal logic as an effective means of analysing and evaluating everyday reasoning and argumentation. As it developed, IL began to adopt a dialectical conception of its subjec...
متن کاملTowards a Dialectical Approach for Conversational Agents in Selling Situations
The use of virtual agents to intelligently interface with online customers of e-commerce businesses is remarkably increasing. Most of these virtual agents are designed to assist online customers while searching for information related to a specific product or service, while few agents are intended for promoting and selling a product or a service. Within the later type, our aim is to provide pro...
متن کاملA Dialectical Approach for Argument-Based Judgment Aggregation
The current paper provides a dialectical interpretation of the argumentation-based judgment aggregation operators of Caminada and Pigozzi. In particular, we define discussion-based proof procedures for the foundational concepts of down-admissible and up-complete. We then show how these proof procedures can be used as the basis of dialectical proof procedures for the sceptical, credulous and sup...
متن کاملJapanese Predicate Argument Structure Analysis Exploiting Argument Position and Type
We propose an approach to Japanese predicate argument structure analysis exploiting argument position and type. In particular, we propose the following two methods. First, in order to use information in the sentences in preceding context of the predicate more effectively, we propose an improved similarity measure between argument positions which is more robust than a previous co-reference-based...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Informal Logic
سال: 1985
ISSN: 0824-2577,0824-2577
DOI: 10.22329/il.v7i2.2713