Developing Science Parks: Global Experience and Possible Guidelines for the Donbas Region’s Innovative Economic Recovery

For many years, the technological deterioration of physical assets, high energy intensity production, structural imbalance industrial complex, and related complex technogenic ecological situation, which today already carries systemic threats, remained acute problems for Donbass. The conflict in eastern Ukraine has exposed these problems, made them admit that without introduction advanced technologies effective management solutions, it will hardly be possible to revive economic potential region on a qualitatively new basis. paper concentrates search opportunities mitigate eliminate impact challenges existing Donbass, implement restructuring region's economy by using tool science parks. practicality organizing financing parks is now being worked out Ministry Reintegration Temporarily Occupied Territories within Strategy Economic Development Donetsk Luhansk regions until 2030. experience other countries world regarding goals methods creation, element composition, specialization, construction cost effectiveness activities scientific with aim regeneration Lugansk been studied. article reflects USA (in particular, Silicon Valley Research Triangle Park parks); Ireland (Wyeth Biopharma Science Park); Germany (Rhein Elbe Poland (Poznan Technology Park, Naukowo – Technologiczny «Technopark Gliwice», Poland-East Suwa?ki). Based results analysis, was determined building ranges from USD 35-60 million (Poland) 3-5 billion (United States America). Particular attention paid features architectural planning organization abroad Ukraine. design proposals parks, developed Zaporizhzhia Kyiv, are presented as model guidelines use Building study experience, well project its implementation Ukraine, concluded creation can considered an innovative renewal regional economy. To enhance influence innovation processes studied whole, were amend supplement laws "On Parks", Amendments Certain Laws Regarding Activation Parks". used government relevant ministry when justifying choice models future their location, costs.