Deliberative versus Intuitive Psychodiagnostic Decision
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Deliberative Decision Making in “Conscious” Software Agents
When we humans are faced with a problem to solve, we often create in our mind different strategies or possible solutions. We imagine the effects of executing each strategy or trial solution without actually doing so. It's a kind of internal virtual reality. Eventually, we decide upon one strategy or trial solution and try solving the problem using it. This whole process is called deliberation. ...
متن کاملEvaluating psychodiagnostic decisions.
RATIONALE Several frameworks can be used to evaluate decision making. These may relate to different aspects of the decision-making process, or concern the decision outcome. Evaluations of psychodiagnostic decisions have shown diagnosticians to be poor decision makers. In this essay we argue that this finding results from the evaluation of only one part of the diagnostic process. METHOD We put...
متن کاملThe Ethical Dangers of Deliberative Decision Making
This project benefited from the financial assistance of the Dispute Resolution Research Center at the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. I want to thank Stéphane Côté, Sanford DeVoe, Adam Galinsky, Julian House, Keith Murnighan, Brendan Strejcek, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments on early versions of this manuscript. The ...
متن کاملContingency Management and Deliberative Decision-Making Processes
Contingency management is an effective treatment for drug addiction. The current explanation for its success is rooted in alternative reinforcement theory. We suggest that alternative reinforcement theory is inadequate to explain the success of contingency management and produce a model based on demand curves that show how little the monetary rewards offered in this treatment would affect drug ...
متن کاملIntermediate Effects in Psychodiagnostic Classification
Most comparative studies of performance in psychodiagnostic classification contrast novices with very experienced clinicians, and do not include a group with an intermediate level of experience. We describe an empirical study involving 41 clinicians with three levels of experience. We asked novices, intermediates, and very experienced psychodiagnosticians to give the diagnostic (DSM) classifica...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychology
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2152-7180,2152-7199
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2016.712143