Decisions with conflicting and imprecise information
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Decisions with conflicting and imprecise information
The most usual procedure when facing decisions in complex settings consists in consulting experts, aggregating the information they provide, and deciding on the basis of this aggregated information. We argue that such a procedure entails a substantial loss, insofar as it precludes the possibility to take into account simultaneously the decision maker’s attitude towards conflict among experts an...
متن کاملA Bayesian approach to fusing uncertain, imprecise and conflicting information
The Dezert–Smarandache theory (DSmT) and transferable belief model (TBM) both address concerns with the Bayesian methodology as applied to applications involving the fusion of uncertain, imprecise and conflicting information. In this paper, we revisit these concerns regarding the Bayesian methodology in the light of recent developments in the context of the DSmT and TBM. We show that, by exploi...
متن کاملRough Set Approach to Information Tables with Imprecise Decisions
In this paper, we treat information tables with imprecise decisions, for short, imprecise decision tables. In the imprecise decision tables, decision attribute values are specified imprecisely. Under such decision tables, lower and upper object sets for a set of decision attribute values are defined. Their properties are shown. Concepts of reducts of imprecise decision tables are studied. Disce...
متن کاملIs Imprecise Knowledge Better than Conflicting Expertise? Evidence from Insurers’ Decisions in the United States
This paper reports the results of the first experiment in the United States designed to distinguish two sources of ambiguity: imprecise ambiguity (expert groups agree on a range of probability, but not on any point estimate) versus conflict ambiguity (each expert group provides precise probability estimates which differ from one group to another). The specific context is whether risk profession...
متن کاملDealing with imprecise information in group multicriteria decisions: a methodology and a GDSS architecture
This paper outlines a distributed GDSS suitable to be used over the Internet, based on the VIP Analysis methodology and software. VIP Analysis incorporates complementary approaches to deal with the aggregation of multicriteria performances by means of an additive value function under imprecise information. This proposed GDSS intends to support a decision panel forming a democratic decision unit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Choice and Welfare
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0176-1714,1432-217X
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-012-0691-1