DE RHAMWITT COHOMOLOGY FOR A PROPER AND SMOOTH MORPHISM
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Moduli of Complexes on a Proper Morphism
Given a proper morphism X → S, we show that a large class of objects in the derived category of X naturally form an Artin stack locally of finite presentation over S. This class includes S-flat coherent sheaves and, more generally, contains the collection of all S-flat objects which can appear in the heart of a reasonable sheaf of t-structures on X. In this sense, this is the Mother of all Modu...
متن کاملHochschild cohomology, the characteristic morphism and derived deformations
A notion of Hochschild cohomology HH∗(A) of an abelian category A was defined by Lowen and Van den Bergh (2005) and they showed the existence of a characteristic morphism χ from the Hochschild cohomology of A into the graded centre Z∗(Db(A)) of the bounded derived category of A. An element c ∈ HH2(A) corresponds to a first order deformation Ac of A (Lowen and Van den Bergh, 2006). The problem o...
متن کاملHigher Direct Images of Coherent Sheaves under a Proper Morphism
1.1. Injective resolutions. Let C be an abelian category. An object I ∈ C is injective if the functor Hom(−, I) is exact. An injective resolution of an object A ∈ C is an exact sequence 0→ A→ I → I → . . . where I• are injective. We say C has enough injectives if every object has an injective resolution. It is easy to see that this is equivalent to saying every object can be embedded in an inje...
متن کاملCrystalline Cohomology and De Rham Cohomology
The goal of this short paper is to give a slightly different perspective on the comparison between crystalline cohomology and de Rham cohomology. Most notably, we reprove Berthelot’s comparison result without using pd-stratifications, linearisations, and pd-differential operators. Crystalline cohomology is a p-adic cohomology theory for varieties in characteristic p created by Berthelot [Ber74]...
متن کاملCohomology with Proper Supports and Ehresmann’s Theorem
2 Cohomology with Proper Supports In our étale cohomology setting, however, j! no longer sends injectives to injectives, and the isomorphism (1.1) may not hold. Consider the following example: Example 2.1. Consider f : AC → C. A closed subset of AC is either the entire line AC or a finite set of closed points, so for any sheaf F on AC, if a section s ∈ Γ(AC,F) has proper support, then supp(s) m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu
سال: 2004
ISSN: 1475-3030
DOI: 10.1017/s1474748004000088