Content internalism and testimonial knowledge

It is commonly assumed that content preservation required for success in testimonial exchanges. Many internalists, however, cannot endorse this assumption. They must claim instead exchanges can often succeed when the grasped by hearer not of speaker’s testimony, p, but some merely similar content, p*. Goldberg (2007. Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) argues internalist approach epistemically problematic: it maintain certain features thought to be characteristic I argue that, contrary appearances, internalist’s account just as respectable traditional ‘same content’ favoured externalists.