Conflicting evidence combination based on uncertainty measure and distance of evidence
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Conflicting evidence combination based on uncertainty measure and distance of evidence
Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is widely used in many fields of information fusion. However, the counter-intuitive results may be obtained when combining with highly conflicting evidence. To deal with such a problem, we put forward a new method based on the distance of evidence and the uncertainty measure. First, based on the distance of evidence, the evidence is divided into two parts, the cr...
متن کاملConflicting evidence about long-distance animal navigation.
Because of conflicting evidence about several fundamental issues, long-distance animal navigation has yet to be satisfactorily explained. Among the unsolved problems are the nature of genetic spatial control of migration and the relationships between celestial and magnetic compass mechanisms and between different map-related cues in orientation and homing, respectively. In addition, navigation ...
متن کاملReconciling some conflicting evidence on decision making under uncertainty∗
Laboratory experiments concerning decision under uncertainty tend to uncover systematic violations of Bayesian rationality. When models that posit Bayesian rationality are compared to non-experimental data, though, they fit the data well. One possible explanation is that an agent’s global pattern of choices may not be rationalizable, but that the pattern may satisfy weak conditions sufficent to...
متن کاملA new combination approach based on improved evidence distance
Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is a powerful tool in information fusion. When the evidence are highly conflicting, the counter-intuitive results will be presented. To adress this open issue, a new method based on evidence distance of Jousselme and Hausdorff distance is proposed. Weight of each evidence can be computed, preprocess the original evidence to generate a new evidence. The Dempster’s...
متن کاملClustering belief functions based on attracting and conflicting metalevel evidence
Abstract In this paper we develop a method for clustering belief functions based on attracting and conflicting metalevel evidence. Such clustering is done when the belief functions concern multiple events, and all belief functions are mixed up. The clustering process is used as the means for separating the belief functions into subsets that should be handled independently. While the conflicting...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SpringerPlus
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2193-1801
DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2863-4