Comparison of the Energy Recovery Potential Using Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste of Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire)

نویسندگان

چکیده

The development of societies and industrial progress cannot be achieved without the use electricity. growing demand for energy degradation environment by current sources force us to look other methods produce it. production renewable from landfill waste reduces environmental problems caused combustion coal, oil natural gas. Therefore, in this work, life cycle assement is used compare different recovery options four solid management systems with each assess corresponding carbon credit. are: landfilling (scenario S0), S1), incineration combined anaerobic digestion both cases S2) S3). assessment showed that scenario S2 best option an potential 890.9 GWh/year, which corresponds 11% Cote d’Ivoire's net electricity 2015. In addition, has led a better reduction methane emissions credit USD 12168200 total amount managed one year. However, S1 wrong terms 232.2 GWh/year 3% Ivory Coast's Regarding reductions CO2equivalent emissions, those are lowest US$ 12,025,343. From point view clean green energy, voice followed optimal MSW technique Abidjan organic fraction, fuel residues.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Tehran

Due to increasing solid waste generation and their significant impacts on human health, environmental assessment of the management and disposal methods become more and more important. There are various disposal methods which are the combinations that originate from a wide range of solid waste management systems. In this study, municipal waste of Tehran (which totals to 7507.5 tons/day) is asses...

متن کامل

assessment of the efficiency of s.p.g.c refineries using network dea

data envelopment analysis (dea) is a powerful tool for measuring relative efficiency of organizational units referred to as decision making units (dmus). in most cases dmus have network structures with internal linking activities. traditional dea models, however, consider dmus as black boxes with no regard to their linking activities and therefore do not provide decision makers with the reasons...

Selecting the best options of management of municipal solid waste using life cycle assessment methodology (case study: Noor city)

Background and Objective:  one of the major challenges in urban management in human societies is related to the collection, recycling and disposal of solid waste and sewage. Poor waste management causes pollution of water, soil and air. It will have a major impact on public health. The aim of present study was to investigate the current status and select the best options of management of munici...

متن کامل

Life Cycle Management of Municipal Solid Waste

Life-cycle assessment concepts and methods are currently being applied to evaluate integrated municipal solid waste management strategies throughout the world. The Research Triangle Institute and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are working to develop a computer-based decision support tool to evaluate integrated municipal solid waste management strategies in the United States. The waste...

متن کامل

Using life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management in Tehran Municipality Region 20

Background: Due to the lack of a proper waste management system, Tehran Municipality Region 20 is facing economic and environmental problems such as the high costs of a disposal system and source pollution. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method for collecting and evaluating the inputs, outputs, and potential environmental impacts of a product system throughout its life cycle. The current stud...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2326-957X', '2326-960X']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.13