Comparison of subscription access and open access obstetrics and gynecology journals in the SCImago database
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact
BACKGROUND In the past few years there has been an ongoing debate as to whether the proliferation of open access (OA) publishing would damage the peer review system and put the quality of scientific journal publishing at risk. Our aim was to inform this debate by comparing the scientific impact of OA journals with subscription journals, controlling for journal age, the country of the publisher,...
متن کاملOpen Access versus Subscription Access Journals of Paediatric Surgery
Open access journals provide an opportunity to read quality research articles through internet across the world. Concern has been shown as to the standard of articles published in open access journals and their peer review process but same has been refuted by a study of Björk and Solomon.[1] They have concluded that scientific impact of open access journal is now approaching that of subscriptio...
متن کاملaccess versus subscription journals : a comparison of scientific impact
Background: In the past few years there has been an ongoing debate as to whether the proliferation of open access (OA) publishing would damage the peer review system and put the quality of scientific journal publishing at risk. Our aim was to inform this debate by comparing the scientific impact of OA journals with subscription journals, controlling for journal age, the country of the publisher...
متن کاملpredatory open access journals
سخن سردبیر editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره پانزدهم، آبان 1395، 808-807 مجلات یغماگر با دسترسی آزاد predatory open access journals محسن رضائیان[1]،[2] m. rezaeian پیدایش و رشد «مجلات با دسترسی آزاد» (open access journals) در سالیان اخیر، نویدبخش دوره جدیدی از چاپ و انتشار یافته های نوین علمی بود. قرار بود که در این دوره جدید، نویسندگان یک مقاله علمی با پرداخت هزینه های چاپ، نتیجه ...
متن کاملPeer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
BACKGROUND Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for authors, funders, publishers, and institutions to assure quality of peer-review in academic journals. I propose that transparency of the peer-review process may be seen as an indicator of the quality of peer-review, and develop and validate...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Ginekologia Polska
سال: 2021
ISSN: 2543-6767,0017-0011
DOI: 10.5603/gp.a2021.0124