Comparative study on maternal morbidity in elective and emergency caeserean section at tertiary hospital
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: The incidence of caesarean sections has significantly increased over the previous thirty years and nearly doubled in current decade, because more liberalisation indications sections. India’s section rates have surpassed WHO cutoff point 15%, raising serious public health issues. prevalence C-section India was 8.5% NFHS-3 while data NFHS-4 show that it to 17.2%. Thus, almost 9% 10 years. Objective compare maternal morbidity elective emergency section. Methods: Institution based comparative study conducted among 108 females undergoing lower segment at JNUIMSRC, Jaipur. After taking written informed consent patients were enrolled for study. Once collected analysed as per appropriate statistical analysis. Results: Incidence LSCS 23.6% 76.4%. most common indication (38.1%) fetal distress (13.3%) followed by malpresentation (11.4%). intraoperative complications 29% with being atonic PPH (12.4%) traumatic (5.9%), bladder bowel injury (0.7%). post operative 51.9% anaemia (20.8%), (10%), puerperal sepsis (8%). Conclusions: If performed medical reasons, CS can save lives both mothers babies. Therefore, CSs should preferably only be when necessary reasons. Morbidity is than complication anemia complication.
منابع مشابه
Maternal morbidity in emergency versus elective caesarean section at a tertiary care hospital.
BACKGROUND In the past 30 years the rate of caesarean section (C/S) has steadily increased from 5% to more than 20% for many avoidable and unavoidable indications. The objective of this study was to compare maternal morbidity and determine its cause in elective and emergency caesarean section. METHOD It was a cross-sectional comparative study conducted in Civil Hospital Karachi at Obs/Gyn Uni...
متن کاملRate and Indications of Elective and Emergency Caesarean Section; a Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Peshawar.
BACKGROUND The study was conducted to determine the rate and clinical indications for emergency and elective caesarean section. METHODS This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted from December 2010 to January 2011 in Gynaecology unit-A of Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar. Consecutive patients who gave birth in the hospital during the study period were included in the study. There we...
متن کاملElective Versus Emergency Caesarean Section: Maternal Complications and Neonatal Outcomes
Background: Emergency Caesarean birth in labour has been associated with an increased chance of infection, bleeding (increasing the need of blood transfusion) and Deep Venous Thrombosis when compared with both vaginal birth and elective caesarean birth Objectives: to compare emergency and elective Caesarean section with regard to intra operative and post operative complications in both mother a...
متن کاملNeonatal respiratory morbidity after elective cesarean section.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine the rate of respiratory morbidity in neonates delivered by elective cesarean delivery (ECD) at term, with a definite confirmation of gestational age (GA) by 1st-trimester ultrasound. METHODS Consecutive women carrying a singleton pregnancy and undergoing ECD at term (>38 1/7 weeks), confirmed by 1st-trimester ultrasound, were included in th...
متن کاملMaternal and fetal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean section in a developing country.
As the other major European countries, Croatia has also seen a marked increase in the rate of caesarean sections. The aim of this study was to determine the most common reasons for caesarean section, to compare emergency and elective caesarean section in regard to intraoperative and postoperative complications in both mother and child, and to assess the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) in ou...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2320-1770', '2320-1789']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20232724