Comparative Study between Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy: Complications and Management

نویسندگان

چکیده

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently the most widely used surgical procedure for treatment of gallstones. The aim study was to analyze and compare postoperative results patients undergoing laparoscopic or open (OC) with regard complications, recovery time hospital stays.
 Materials Methods: This a retrospective which conducted at General Hospital Khulna some private in City from January 2015 December 2019. analyzed among 950 patients, 20-65 years old, diagnosed gallstones LC OC. We evaluated respiratory site infection, deep vein thrombosis, oral feeding ambulation, use antibiotics duration period.
 Results: 570(60%) 380 (40%) Most were female (55%). Patients' comorbidities hypertension (12.8%), diabetes mellitus (4.5%) asthma (1.00%). resulted lower prevalence complications (2.8%) than OC (3.4%). Postoperative hospitalization 2-3 days found 5-7 OC.
 Conclusion: showed higher benefits earlier shorter mean stay compared cholecystectomy.
 Medicine Today 2021 Vol.33(1): 19-21

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Complications After Laparoscopic and Conventional Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study

The growing popularity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has made extensive series comparing laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy in a prospective, randomized way nearly impossible. To evaluate LC we compared retrospectively 800 laparoscopic with 748 conventional cholecystectomies (CC). Of the 800 LC, 10 (1.2%) were converted to laparotomy. 6 conversions were related to aberrant ana...

متن کامل

Comparative Changes in Tissue Oxygenation Between Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND Previous studies examined the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) versus open cholecystectomy (OC) on physiological variables of the respiratory system. In this study we compared changes in arterial blood gases-related parameters between LC and OC to assess their comparative influence on gas exchange. METHODS We studied 28 patients, operated under identical anesthetic proto...

متن کامل

A comparison between two groups of diabetic and non-diabetic patients regarding complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: Cholecystectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgeries and its preferred method is laparoscopy. The difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in diabetic patients is not clear and the preferred method of cholecystectomy in these patients is still under controversy. Therefore, this study was performed to evaluate the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in diabetic and ...

متن کامل

A Prospective Study of Altered Inflammatory Response and Its Clinical Outcome Following Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy

Background: Inflammatory response following surgical trauma has long been a matter of study. Results, however, have been varied. We sought to assess changes in the levels of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy and their impact on the clinical outcome of patients concerning the postoperative pain score.Methods: The study in...

متن کامل

Rate of complications and conversions after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although many advantages of laparoscopic method in regard to open one have been already proved, both surgical methods may cause a certain number of complications. The goal of the study is to answer the question: Is Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) safer and more satisfactory method than open cholecystectomy (OC) concerning number, type and seriousness of complications...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Medicine today

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1810-1828', '2408-8714']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v33i01.52152