Comment — WHO outsourcing dilemma: for whose benefit, at whose expense?

Text Data Mining from the Author's Perspective: Whose Text, Whose Mining, and to Whose Benefit?

Researchers have sought technical access to proprietary databases of published materials since the earliest days of online databases in the latter 1970s, yet publishers continue to write university contracts based only on human readership. By the time of Google Books and the associated author lawsuits, ca 2005, we learned that publishers wished to restrict “nonconsumptive use” of scholarly cont...

Year one dental visit--for whose benefit?

Whose voice? Whose choice? Whose power?

Coercion in psychiatry stems from the historic inequality between the psychiatrist and the person who is designated as the "patient," even though he/she may not have chosen this role, and may not see him/herself as needing psychiatric attention. The psychiatrist has the power to define an individual as mentally ill, and then to confine and treat the person based on that definition. The user/sur...

Whose Copy? Whose Rights?

This is the third installment in a series of editorials on the implications of open-access publishing for established publishing practices and stakeholders in scientifi c and medical research. T he questions, tensions, and social concerns surrounding copyright and the Internet are very different for scientifi c and medical literature than for other kinds of easily reproducible digital works. Pe...

Whose News? Whose Values?

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opin...