Coalitional Games for Downlink Multicell Beamforming
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
An efficient algorithm for weighted sum-rate maximization in multicell downlink beamforming
This paper considers coordinated linear precoding for rate optimization in downlink multicell, multiuser orthogonal frequencydivision multiple access networks. We focus on two different design criteria. In the first, the weighted sum-rate is maximized under transmit power constraints per base station. In the second, we minimize the total transmit power satisfying the signal-to-interference-plus...
متن کاملCoordinated multicell beamforming for massive multiple-input multiple-output systems based on uplink-downlink duality
This paper studies joint beamforming and power allocation for multicell multiuser multi-antenna systems with the objective of maximising the minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (max–min SINR). The authors first consider developing an iterative algorithm to achieve the optimal performance by extending the uplink–downlink duality for finite-scale wireless communication systems. The so...
متن کاملLogics for Coalitional Games
We define formalisms to reason about Coalitional Games (CGs), in which one can express what coalitions of agents can achieve. We start with Quantified CGs (QCGs), in which each agent has some goals he wants to satisfy, which may change over time. Then we focus on CGs themselves. Although CGs can be well analysed in a formalism close to Pauly’s Coalition Logic, in QCGs, when having preferences, ...
متن کاملAlgorithms for Coalitional Games
Coalitional games are studied extensively in economics and computer science. They have recently shown to be a useful formalism and are applicable to a wide range of domains from electronic commerce to trade and negotiation systems. Key topics in coalitional games include both deciding the stability of given coalitions and calculating representative or all stable coalitions. However, typically t...
متن کاملCoalitional games for abstract argumentation
In this work we address the issue of the uncertainty faced by a user participating in multiagent debate. We propose a way to compute the relative relevance of arguments for such a user, by merging the classical argumentation framework proposed in [5] into a game theoretic coalitional setting, where the worth of a collection of arguments (opinions) can be seen as the combination of the informati...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: IEEE Access
سال: 2017
ISSN: 2169-3536
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2702058