Characterising an MEP’s argumentative style
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract There is much more to argumentative style than just the well-known presentational (“linguistic”) dimension. Equally important dimensions of styles utilised in resolving a difference opinion are topical dimension selection standpoints, starting points, arguments and concluding statements put forward discourse adaptations presumed demand audience that be convinced. In these three manifest themselves together moves made, routes chosen strategic considerations brought bear. Starting from this perspective, it shown article how can identified was by Member European Parliament plenary debate on labelling fruit juices.
منابع مشابه
Towards an Argumentative Dialogue System
In this work we propose a scheme for an Argumentative Dialogue System that allows a user to discuss a certain topic with a virtual agent using natural language. Starting from an agent vs agent case, we address the optimization of the agent strategy by formulating the problem as a Stochastic Game and show that this formalism generally allows the inclusion of additional strategical moves that are...
متن کاملDefeasible Logic Programming: An Argumentative Approach
The work reported here introduces Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), a formalism that combines results of Logic Programming and Defeasible Argumentation. DeLP provides the possibility of representing information in the form of weak rules in a declarative manner, and a defeasible argumentation inference mechanism for warranting the entailed conclusions. In DeLP an argumentation formalism will ...
متن کاملAn Argumentative Model for Service-Oriented Agents
In this paper we propose an argumentative agent model able to reason and make decisions, communicate and negotiate with other agents with the aim of supporting service selection and composition. Actually, our agent model is inspired from the general-purpose KGP agent model which deals only partially with priorities as required by our application. We provide here an argumentation framework which...
متن کاملAn Argumentative Annotation Schema for Meeting Discussions
In this article, we are interested in the annotation of transcriptions of human-human dialogue taken from meeting records. We first propose a meeting content model where conversational acts are interpreted with respect to their argumentative force and their role in building the argumentative structure of the meeting discussion. Argumentation in dialogue describes the way participants take part ...
متن کاملAn Alternative Semantics for Argumentative Systems
Defeasible argumentation is one of the approaches that addresses the challenges arising when we reason defeasibly, with several formalisms in the literature reaching a mature state. Considering that most of these theories eventually shifted their semantics towards dialectical characterizations, we believe that a sufficiently generic model of the process of reasoning in dialectical terms could a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Argumentation in Context
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2211-4750', '2211-4742']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21020.eem