Causes of judicial errors in administrative jurisdiction

نویسندگان

چکیده

The paper examines the causes of judicial errors in administrative proceedings. It has been established that a error proceedings is result activity, which indicates inability judiciary to effectively protect rights, freedoms and interests individuals, rights legal entities from violations by subjects authority. A recognized as an regardless presence or absence fault particular judge who made decision with it. subject error, most often, makes it carelessness, self-confidence, unintentional actions, accidental etc. If commits deliberate actions aimed at distorting fundamental principles grossly violating individuals entities, then he not but criminal offense. Judicial are serious obstacle effective functioning justice system, they provoke occurrence number consequences: loss trust, resource costs, psychological losses. have negative impact on awareness citizens, their state, undermine authority state general bodies particular, significant financial time In order cope problem proceedings, domestic system should strive to: eliminate defects material procedural legislation; reducing workload judges courts; bringing court staff regular number,

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Administrative Management, Administrative Regulation and the Judicial Process

In discussing problems connected with what is called public administration and administrative law, confusion not infrequently results from a failure to understand at the outset what is meant by the term "administration". A distinguished authority 1 has described administration as essentially the process of translating the general into the particular, and, as one phase of this process, the task ...

متن کامل

collocation errors in translations of the holy quran

the present study aims at identifying, classifying and analyzing collocation errors made by translators of the holy quran into english.findings indicated that collocationally the most acceptablt translation was done by ivring but the least appropriate one made by pickthall.

The Role of Judicial Procedure Courts in the Development of Iranian Administrative Law

 Today, in leading administrative law systems, the judicial process along with the law is the most important source of legal rules, and the law alone can not feed the legal system. Although in the administrative law system of Iran, the use of judicial procedure has often been considered as a source and interpretation of the law and not as the main source, but the role of administrative courts, ...

متن کامل

principeles and criteria of administrative judicial review in switzerland law

principles of judicial review in administrative law are basic criteria developed through judicial decisions. most of these principles have a legal value in modern administrative law. in this paper some of these principles and criteria have been studied in switzerland administrative law. in this country the legality, equality, public interest, good faith, hearing and proportionality principles h...

متن کامل

An Exploratory Analysis of Judicial Elections in Texas: Does Subject Matter Jurisdiction Matter?

The existence of both the Texas Supreme Court and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals makes it possible to test several important hypotheses of elections held between 1988 and 2008 using a variety of statistical tools related to the impact that subject matter jurisdiction (civil versus criminal) has on the outcomes of an election. In this comparative analysis, this article shows that the factors th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Ekonomìka, fìnansi, pravo

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2409-1944', '2786-5517']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2023.6.20