Care to Compare
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Compare Clouds: Visualizing Text Corpora to Compare Media Frames
Media frames represent distinct ways of communicating about issues that are reflected in choices of key words and phrases. In this paper we develop a visualization technique and visual analytic system that enables the study of media frames across text corpora. In particular our system allows scholars or other analysts to compare media frames in a visualization called the Compare Cloud, which ex...
متن کاملHow to Compare Treebanks
Recent years have seen an increasing interest in developing standards for linguistic annotation, with a focus on the interoperability of the resources. This effort, however, requires a profound knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of linguistic annotation schemes in order to avoid importing the flaws and weaknesses of existing encoding schemes into the new standards. This paper address...
متن کاملCompare the Quality of Nursing Care Related to Enteral Nutrition with Standards in Patients at Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Hospitals of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Background: Malnutrition is a common clinical problem in critically ill patient at ICU. It has irreversible consequences for patients and causes heavy health care costs for the healthcare system. Nurses are the main responsible for providing nutritional care to patients, but studies show that nurses' compliance with standards in patient care is very low. Therefore, it is important to determine...
متن کاملHow to compare adequacy of algorithms to control blood glucose in the intensive care unit?
Vogelzang et al. retrospectively assessed a derivative marker of blood glucose control over time in the intensive care unit (ICU), "the hyperglycemic index" (HGI), in relation to outcome. The HGI predicted mortality better than other indices of blood glucose control that do not take the duration of hyperglycemia into account. This provided further support to the concept of maintaining normoglyc...
متن کاملHow to compare biologic drugs.
This consensus document reviews the evidence on the evaluation of biological drugs. The main conclusions of the group are: a) the current evidence on biological comparisons is based on indirect comparisons and is generally unreliable and with important methodological limitations. Therefore, b) it is considered necessary to amend the regulatory directives in the sense of strongly favoring random...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0803-8740,1502-394X
DOI: 10.1080/08038740.2010.499099