منابع مشابه
François Recanati , Literal Meaning , Cambridge : Cambridge University
Contrary to a certain traditional conception dating back at least to Locke, everyday linguistic communication is not a simple matter of putting one's thoughts into words for one's audience to put back into thoughts. This naive " code model " misses the fact that what a speaker means in uttering a sentence can be distinct in various ways from what the sentence means. She might not mean what she ...
متن کاملOF CAMBRIDGE Cambridge Working Papers in Economics
I study strategy-proof assignment mechanisms where the agents reveal their preference rankings over the available objects. A stochastic mechanism returns lotteries over deterministic assignments, and mechanisms are compared according to first-order stochastic dominance. I show that non-wasteful strategy-proof mechanisms are not dominated by strategy-proof mechanisms, however nonwastefulness is ...
متن کاملAssessing Reading . ( 2000 ) . J . Charles Alderson . Cambridge : Cambridge University
The real question we are asking when we look at assessing reading is: What distinguishes a good reader from a poor reader? Implicit in this question is an even more fundamental question: What are we doing when we read? Assessment is an attempt to answer the first question, but if we cannot at least try to answer the second, we do not know what we are assessing, and any measure or description of...
متن کاملBiomechanics, Anthropometry, Work Physiology
Objective: A military multitasking environment was simulated to examine the effects of an intelligent agent, RoboLeader, on the performance of robotics operators. Background: The participants’ task was to manage a team of ground robots with the assistance of RoboLeader, an intelligent agent capable of coordinating the robots and changing their routes on the basis of battlefield developments. Me...
متن کاملInterobserver errors in anthropometry.
To present basic information on the interobserver precision and accuracy of 32 selected anthropometric measurement items, six observers measured each of 37 subjects once in two days. The data were analyzed by using ANOVA, and mean absolute bias, standard deviation of bias, and mean absolute bias in standard deviation unit were used as measures of bias. By comparing the results of the two days, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland
سال: 1889
ISSN: 0959-5295
DOI: 10.2307/2842408