Bringing narrative victimology to transitional justice: Blame, victimhood and life stories of wrongful conviction

نویسندگان

چکیده

This article applies a narrative victimological lens of inquiry to the memoirs those wrongfully convicted high profile politically violent offences arising from conflict in North Ireland. Using these life stories wrongful conviction, critically examines how nuanced and complex understandings victimhood blame emerge within victims’ own testimony. While on one hand, victims can ‘story’ simplistic ways that echo dominant paradigms found criminological literature, at same time they more sophisticated reflect debates transitional justice literature. The ability take both generous approach recognises harm experienced by others self-reflective one's culpability, it is submitted, shows potential value proposed oral history mechanisms have allowing different perspectives testimony who suffered harms like conviction.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Probability, Justice, and the Risk of Wrongful Conviction

I am a professor of statistics, and most of my work is fairly technical and mathematical. But one day I wrote a book for the general public, which did unexpected well, especially in Canada. I was then interviewed by the media about such diverse topics as lottery probabilities, public opinion polls, violent crime rates, sports statistics, and more, and was even involved in probing a major lotter...

متن کامل

Post-Conviction DNA Testing and Wrongful Conviction

To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally-funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

متن کامل

Eyewitness Identifications and State Courts as Guardians against Wrongful Conviction

Despite a growing awareness that mistaken eyewitness identifications contribute significantly to wrongful convictions, most courts continue to apply federal Due Process criteria for admissibility of eyewitness identification that has proved useless in protecting against the use of highly unreliable evidence. In response, this article reviews the path-breaking decisions of several state supreme ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Criminology

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1477-3708', '1741-2609']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211038519