Bohmian Mechanics is Not Deterministic

Abstract I argue that Bohmian mechanics (or any similar pilot-wave theory) cannot reasonably be claimed to a deterministic theory. If one assumes the “quantum equilibrium distribution” provided by wave function of universe, requires an external random oracle in order describe (Kolmogorov–Levin–Chaitin) algorithmic randomness properties typical outcome sequences long runs repeated identical experiments (which provably follow from Born rule). This lies beyond scope extension thereof), including impossibility explaining property question “random” initial conditions. Thus advantages over other interpretations quantum mechanics, if any, must lie at ontological level, and its potential derive distribution hence rule.