Best response equivalence

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Best response equivalence

Two games are best-response equivalent if they have the same best-response correspondence. We provide a characterization of when two games are best-response equivalent. The characterizations exploit a dual relationship between payoff differences and beliefs. Some “potential game” arguments [Games Econ. Behav. 14 (1996) 124] rely only on the property that potential games are best-response equiva...

متن کامل

Tempered best response dynamics

We propose a new deterministic evolutionary dynamic—the tempered best response dynamic (tBRD)—to capture two features of economic decision making: optimization and continuous sensitivity to incentives. That is, in the tBRD, an agent is more likely to revise his action when his current payoff is further from the optimal payoff, and he always switches to an optimal action when revising. The tBRD ...

متن کامل

Best-Response Mechanisms

Under many protocols—in computerized settings and in economics settings—participants repeatedly “best respond” to each others’ actions until the system “converges” to an equilibrium point. We ask when does such myopic “local rationality” imply “global rationality”, i.e., when is it best for a player, given that the others are repeatedly best-responding, to also repeatedly best-respond? We exhib...

متن کامل

p-Best response set

This paper introduces a notion of p-best response set (p-BR). We build on this notion in order to provide a new set-valued concept: the minimal p-best response set (p-MBR). After proving general existence results of the p-MBR, we show that it characterizes set-valued stability concepts in a dynamic with Poisson revision opportunities borrowed fromMatsui and Matsuyama [An approach to equilibrium...

متن کامل

Best - Response Mechanisms ( Extended Abstract )

Under many protocols — in computerized settings and in economics settings — participants repeatedly “best respond” to each others’ actions until the system “converges” to an equilibrium point. We ask when such myopic “local rationality” implies “global rationality”, i.e., when is it best for a player, given that the others are repeatedly best-responding, to also repeatedly best-respond? We exhi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Games and Economic Behavior

سال: 2004

ISSN: 0899-8256

DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2003.12.004