Being Realist about Bayes, and the Predictive Processing Theory of Mind

Some naturalistic philosophers of mind subscribing to the predictive processing theory have adopted a realist attitude towards results Bayesian cognitive science. In this article, we argue that is unwarranted. The research programme in science does not possess special epistemic virtues over alternative approaches for explaining mental phenomena involving uncertainty. particular, approach simpler, more unifying, or rational than alternatives. It also contentious overall better supported by empirical evidence. So, develop philosophical theories on basis interpretation from Naturalistic should instead adopt an anti-realist these and remain agnostic as whether models are true. For continuing with exclusive focus praise Bayes within debates about will impede progress understanding scientific practice computational well architecture mind.