Argumentative explanations for interactive recommendations

نویسندگان

چکیده

A significant challenge for recommender systems (RSs), and in fact AI general, is the systematic definition of explanations outputs such a way that both themselves are able to adapt their human users' needs. In this paper we propose an RS hosting vast repertoire explanations, which customisable users content format, thus explanatory requirements, while being reasonably effective (proven empirically). Our built on graphical chassis, allowing extraction argumentation scaffolding, from diverse varied argumentative recommendations can be obtained. These interactive because they questioned by support adaptive feedback mechanisms designed allow self-improve theoretically). Finally, undertake user studies vary characteristics showing general preferences more information, but also tastes diverse, highlighting need our adaptable RS.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Explanations for Command Recommendations

Recently, evaluation of a recommender system has been beyond evaluating just the algorithm. In addition to accuracy of algorithms, user-centric approaches evaluate a system’s e↵ectiveness in presenting recommendations, explaining recommendations and gaining users’ confidence in the system. Existing research focuses on explaining recommendations that are related to user’s current task. However, ...

متن کامل

Explanations and Recommendations for Temporal Inconsistencies

This paper presents an approach to automatically providing explanations and recommendations for temporal inconsistencies within the context of constraint-based, mixed-initiative planning. In this style of planning, a user operation can cause the planner’s temporal constraint network to become inconsistent. For example, if a partial plan has been built and the user is trying to add another activ...

متن کامل

Generating Interactive Explanations

Existing approaches to text generation fail to consider how interactions with the user may be managed within a coherent explanation or description. This paper presents an approach to generating such interactive explanations based on two levels of discourse planning { content planning and dialogue planning. The system developed allows aspects of the changing context to be monitored with an expla...

متن کامل

erating Interactive Explanations

Existing approaches to text generation fail to consider how interactions with the user may be managed within a coherent explanation or description. This paper presents an approach to generating such interactive explanations based on two levels of discourse planning content planning and dialogue planning. The system developed allows aspects of the changing context to be monitored with an explana...

متن کامل

ABEL: An Interactive Tool for Probabilistic Argumentative Reasoning

Most formal approaches to argumentative reasoning under uncertainty focus on the analysis of qualitative aspects. An exception is the framework of probabilistic argumentation systems. Its philosophy is to include both qualitative and quantitative aspects through a simple way of combining logic and probability theory. Probabilities are used to weigh arguments for and against particular hypothese...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Artificial Intelligence

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2633-1403']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103506