Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning
Argumentation concepts have been applied to numerous knowledge engineering endeavours in recent years. For example, a variety of logics have been developed to represent argumentation in the context of a dialectical situation such as a dialogue. In contrast to the dialectical approach, argumentation has also been used to structure knowledge. This can be seen as a non-dialectical approach. The To...
متن کاملRisk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning
We propose a formal framework for intelligent systems which can reason about scientific do mains, in particular about the carcinogenicity of chemicals, and we study its properties. Our framework is grounded in a philosophy of sci entific enquiry and discourse, and uses a model of dialectical argumentation. The formalism en ables representation of scientific uncertainty and conflict in a mann...
متن کاملDialectical Argumentation for Reasoning about Chemical Carcinogenicity
We aim to build intelligent systems which can reason autonomously about the carcinogenicity of chemicals. Scientific debates in this area draw on evidence from multiple, and often conflicting sources, both theoretical and experimental, and participants use various modes of inferential reasoning. In seeking to automate such reasoning, we have first articulated precisely the multiple modes of inf...
متن کاملChance Discovery Using Dialectical Argumentation
The authors propose the use of a dialectical argumentation formalism for chance discovery in domains where knowledge is distributed across a number of distinct knowledge-bases, as in a system of autonomous software agents. Each agent may have only a partial view of a problem, and may have insufficient knowledge to prove particular hypotheses; our formalism provides a means to aggregate across t...
متن کاملAutomated Workflows using Dialectical Argumentation
This paper presents a framework for dynamic workflow creation and execution developed as part of ARGUGRID, a collaborative project that seeks to provide a new model for programming the Grid at a semantic, knowledge-based level of abstraction through the use of argumentative agent technology. In this framework, workflow selection is coordinated by agent interactions based upon a dialogue game th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Knowledge Engineering Review
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0269-8889,1469-8005
DOI: 10.1017/s0269888901000248