Argumentation-Based Logic for Ethical Decision Making

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract As automation in artificial intelligence is increasing, we will need to automate a growing amount of ethical decision making. However, decision- making raises novel challenges for engineers, ethicists and policymakers, who have explore new ways realize this task. The presented work focuses on the development formalization models that aim at ensuring correct behaviour intelligent agents, provable way, extending implementing logic-based proving calculus based argumentation reasoning with support attack arguments. This leads formal theoretical framework competence could be implemented systems order best formalize certain parameters decision-making ensure safety justified trust.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Decision Making with Assumption-Based Argumentation

In this paper, we present two different formal frameworks for representing decision making. In both frameworks, decisions have multiple attributes and meet different goals. In the second framework, decisions take into account preferences over goals. We also study a family of decision functions representing making decisions with different criteria, including decisions meeting all goals, most goa...

متن کامل

Argumentation and decision making ?

This paper summarises our position on the use of symbolic methods for reasoning under uncertainty, and argumentation in particular. Our view is that argumentation ooers a complement to numerical methods for reasoning about belief, and a general framework within which many competing approaches can be understood. In applications we have found that argumentation ooers a variety of beneets for prac...

متن کامل

Argumentation Based Decision Making for Trust in Multi-Agent Systems

Agents in Multi-Agent Systems depend on assistance from others to attain their goals. Often, goals of agents conflict with each other, and agents can be unreliable or deceitful. Therefore, rational agents embedded in an open Multi-Agent System need to be equipped with algorithms to reason about trust. Currently, existing algorithms mainly focus on performance of these algorithms in terms of uti...

متن کامل

The Synergy: A Platform for Argumentation-Based Group Decision Making

“The Synergy” is an on-line collaborative argument-based decision making platform. Our goal is to create a system allowing for both user-driven (the users themselves can vote “for” and “against” any particular option) and machine-driven (the system can propose an order of options based on the arguments provided by users) decision making. For the second option, we implemented existing and newly ...

متن کامل

Semantic Enhanced Argumentation Based Group Decision Making for Complex Problems

This is a questionnaire is designed for evaluating a group argumentation based decision making prototype system, which is a part of my PhD research. A task driven experiment has been designed, during the experiment the participants will be asked to use a developed group argumentation based decision making software system to carry out group discussion around the task, the discussion will be reco...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Studia Humana

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2299-0518']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0015